President Obama recently called corporate tax inversions an "unpatriotic tax loophole".  The multi-national American corporations that are the beneficiaries of the loophole responded by saying that, if the U.S. had a lower corporate tax rate and a simpler tax code, fewer companies would pursue inversions. Although tax inversions have been around since the early 1980's, tax inversions have been in the news in 2014.

What, exactly, is a tax inversion? How much do tax inversions actually affect corporate taxes? Is the tax inversion loophole different than other tax loopholes? How soon are tax inversions going to be shut down by DC?  

According to Wikipedia, a tax inversion, or corporate inversion, is a largely American term for the relocation of a corporation's headquarters to a lower-tax nation, or corporate haven, usually while retaining its material operations in its higher-tax country of origin.

An article from The Economist in September 2014 provides a concise explanation about the benefits of inversions:

The incentive is simple. America taxes profits no matter where they are earned, at a rate of 39% — higher than in any other rich country. When a company becomes foreign through a merger, or “inverts”, it no longer owes American tax on its foreign profit.

How much do tax inversions affect corporate taxes? An article posted by Zachary R. Mider on bloomberg.com in December 2014 describes the results of data compiled on 15 companies that inverted between 1994 and 2009. According to the article, these businesses effectively lowered their average tax rate from 33.5% to 15.7%.

The downside to tax inversions is, obviously, less tax revenue to the IRS. Mr. Mider states thatU.S. companies that have already carried out inversions are likely to lower the amount of revenue collected by the federal government by $2.2 billion or more in 2015. This is is twice the amount of revenue the IRS lost to inversions in 2014, and we know the IRS revenue lost to inversions is going up in the future. An exerpt from Mr. Mider's Bloomberg post frames the potential future impact of tax inversions pretty well:

... That doesn’t include the impact of companies that shift their legal addresses abroad in the future, which one Congressional study pegged at about $2 billion a year over the next decade. Since the first inversion in 1982, the deals have cost more than $9.8 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars....
- Zachary R. Mider, bloomberg.com

The federal government stands to lose quite a bit of revenue through tax inversions. Congress agrees as a whole that something should be done, but they are deadlocked on what to do, and how to do it. 

Right now tax inversions legally lower taxes owed to the IRS, so there is no practical difference between tax inversions and any other legal tax mitigation strategy. In fact, some mid-market companies may start following the lead of the large multi-nationals in seeking foreign corporate mergers. Whether or not this is a reasonable business tax strategy depends on a lot of variables, including how comitted the organization seeking the tax inversion is. Tax inversions are dependent on the acquisition of a foreign company. This is, at best, a resource-heavy executive and administrative effort that could take years to consumate. We also know that the laws will eventually change, we just don't know when or how. Although the split in fed government power and ideology means there is no real risk of the tax inversion loophole closing any time soon, the risk grows greater as federal tax revenue goes down because of it.

Corporate tax inversions are interesting as much for the real impact they have on taxes as they are for the political positioning we observe due to their high profile existence. Any future changes in corporate tax law to manage tax inversions will likely affect companies of all sizes, not just the big multinational ones. They are worth paying attention to.

- The Business & Tax Law Teams
  Rogers Sheffield & Campbell, LLP
 

This article is not intended to provide legal advice. For legal advice on any of the information in this post, please use the form to the right or contact us by phone at 805-963-9721.

 

Practice Areas And Regions Served

Rogers, Sheffield & Campbell, LLP primarily serves individuals, families and businesses up and down California's Central Coast and North Los Angeles County, including many Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, and Ventura County communities.

Our experienced legal team includes business lawyers, real estate lawyers, tax lawyers, estate planning lawyers and civil litigation lawyers. Our areas of legal practice expertise include Business Law, Entity Formation, Real Estate Law, Tax Law, Estate Planning, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Wine Law, Vineyard Law, Civil Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution.

Disclaimer

This website is offered as a service to our clients and to the public  Read our disclaimer

Privacy Policy

Our privacy policy applies to information collected online from users of this website.